arXiv Fall2022

Center for Advanced Studies Seminar on Mondays
at 17.00 via Zoom

November 21, 2022
Evgeniy Kiktenko
(Russian Quantum Center, Steklov Inst.)
Shor’s factoring algorithm

We are going to discuss the celebrated Shor’s algorithm, which allows one to factorize a given composite integer N in poly(log(N)) time with a poly(log(N))-qubit universal quantum computer. First, we will consider how the factoring problem can be reduced to a period-finding problem by using the classical Euclidean algorithm. Then we will see how quantum computing allows one to obtain a period of a given function using quantum Fourier transform

November 14, 2022
Maxim Kazarian
(Skoltech, HSE Univ.)
x-y duality for topological recursion

October 31, 2022
Alexey Sleptsov
(MIPT, IITP, Kurchatov Inst.)
On the Jones problem and the faithful problem of Burau representation for the braid group

October 24, 2022
Michael Finkelberg
(Skoltech, HSE Univ., IITP)
Elliptic zastava

For a semisimple group G and a smooth curve C, open zastava space Z(G,C) is a smooth variety, affine over a configuration space of C. In case C is the additive or multiplicative group, Z(G,C) is isomorphic to a moduli space of euclidean or periodic monopoles. It carries a natural symplectic form, and the projection to the configuration space is an integrable system (open Toda lattice for G=SL(2)). I will explain what happens when C is an elliptic curve. This is a joint work with Mykola Matviichuk and Alexander Polishchuk

October 17, 2022
Anton Shchechkin
(Skoltech, HSE Univ.)
Hamiltonian reductions in matrix Painleve systems

For certain finite groups G of Bäcklund transformations we show that the dynamics of G-invariant configurations of n|G| Calogero-Painlevé particles is equivalent to certain n-particle Calogero–Painlevé system. We also show that the reduction of dynamics on G-invariant subset of n|G|xn|G| matrix Painlevé system is equivalent to certain nxn matrix Painlevé system. The groups G correspond to folding transformations of Painlevé equations. The proofs are based on the Hamiltonian reductions.
The talk is based on the joint work with Mikhail Bershtein and Andrei Grigorev, 2208.04824

October 10, 2022
Senya Shlosman
(Skoltech, Aix Marseille Univ., IITP)
The miracle of integer eigenvalues

I will describe a family of matrices with polynomial entries, which have polynomial eigenvalues. Such matrices appear in the studies of the combinatorics of the partially ordered sets. The phenomenon of the eigenvalues being «integers» was explained in recent work by Richard Kenyon, Maxim Kontsevich, Oleg Ogievetsky, Andrei Pohoata, Will Sawin, and Senya Shlosman

October 3, 2022
Anton Zabrodin
(Skoltech, Steklov Inst.)
Logarithmic gas on a curved contour and Loewner energy

We introduce and study the model of a logarithmic gas at arbitrary temperature on a smooth closed contour in the plane. This model generalizes Dyson’s gas on the unit circle. We compute the non-vanishing terms of the large N expansion of the free energy (N is the number of particles) by iterating the loop equation that is the Ward identity with respect to reparametrizations of the contour. Similarities with conformal field theory will be outlined. The leading and subleading contributions to the free energy are expressed through the conformal radius of the domain surrounded by the contour. The O(1)-contribution is expressed through the spectral determinant of the Neumann jump operator associated with the contour. It coincides with the Loewner energy of the contour as it was defined in the recent works by Y. Wang. This is the joint work with P. Wiegmann

September 26, 2022
Alexander Gaifullin
(Steklov Inst., Skoltech, Moscow Univ.)
Combinatorial formulae for Pontryagin classes and manifolds like projective planes

I will survey my results on combinatorial formulae for Pontryagin classes of triangulated manifolds (2004-2008), together with a recent progress in simplifying the formula for the first Pontryagin class in a joint work with Denis Gorodkov (2019). Also I will give an overview of theory of manifolds like projective planes and explain how combinatorial formulae for Pontryagin classes can be applied to study triangulations of such manifolds

September 19, 2022
Alexander Gaifullin
(Steklov Inst., Skoltech, Moscow Univ.)
27-vertex triangulations of 16-manifolds like the octonionic projective plane

In 1987 Brehm and K\”uhnel proved that any combinatorial triangulation of a $d$-manifold $M$ (without boundary) that is not homeomorphic to the sphere has at least $3d/2+3$ vertices. Moreover, the existence of a triangulation with exactly $3d/2+3$ vertices imposes very strict conditions on the manifold $M$. Namely, first, the dimension $d$ can be equal to 2, 4, 8 or 16 only. Second, $M$ must admit a PL Morse function with three critical points. (Manifolds satisfying this condition were called \textit{manifolds like projective planes} by Eells and Kuiper.) Until the present work there were only 5 known examples of (3d/2+3)-vertex triangulations of $d$-manifolds different from spheres:
1) d=2: a unique $6$-vertex triangulation of the real projective plane, which is the quotient of the boundary of the regular icosahedron by the antipodal involution.
2) d=4: a unique $9$-vertex triangulation of the complex projective plane (K\”uhnel, 1983);
3) d=8: three 15-vertex triangulations of the quaternionic projective plane (construction: Brehm and K\”uhnel, 1992; the proof that these triangulations are indeed homeomorphic to the quaternionic projective plane: Gorodkov, 2016).
The case $d=16$ has remained completely open. No candidate for a $27$-vertex triangulation of a $16$-manifold different from the sphere was known. In my talk I will construct such triangulations. Namely, I will construct four such triangulations with symmetry groups of order $351$ and more than $10^{103}$ such triangulations with smaller symmetry groups. The four triangulations with the symmetry group of order $351$ were found by a special computer algorithm, and the answer for each of them is given by a list of $286$ orbits of $16$-simplices.
A natural conjecture is that all constructed simplicial manifolds are homeomorphic to the octonionic projective plane. Nevertheless, attempts to prove this conjecture reduce to the computation of the second (rational) Pontryagin class of the constructed simplicial manifolds. At the moment, there is no known efficient way to do this

| Spring 2022 | Fall 2021 | Spring 2021 | Fall 2020 | Spring 2020 | Fall 2019 | Spring 2019 | Fall 2018 | Spring 2018 | Fall 2017 | Spring 2017 | Fall 2016 |